![]() ![]() It is claimed that such objections were based either upon ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation of the teachings of Islam. The explanatory notes place a particular importance on refuting the principal objections raised against Islam by non-Muslim writers. ![]() Moreover, according to the author, the Quran contained prophecies and those prophecies which had been fulfilled up until the time of this commentary, constituted an important part of the evidence that it was the revealed word of God. He also believed that the idea of abrogation had been of great detriment to the purity and authenticity of the divine nature of the Quran from which it needed to be absolved. As a result some subjects had become a source of ridicule for Islam and the person of Muhammad. Namely, they uncritically included questionable narrations from unsound sources in their comments and they relied too heavily on Jewish literature. and the great service they rendered for the Quran, but stated that they made two fundamental mistakes. In the preface to the first volume, explaining need for a modern commentary, Mahmood Ahmad acknowledged the importance of the classical commentators like Ibn Kathir, Zamakhshari, Abu Hayyan etc. ![]() The first of the 10 volumes this work were published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, Qadian. Mirza Mahmood Ahmad was the second caliph and leader of the Ahmadiyya movement in Islam.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |